News

From a societal and legal perspective, the issue of sex doll torso ownership is increasingly being debated. This study was designed to test the credibility of the existing psychological, sexual and legal literature regarding love doll torso ownership.

latest discovery

There are many opinions about the range of possible socio-legal positions on sex doll torso ownership. However, there is little empirical analysis on the psychological characteristics or behavioral consequences of real doll torso ownership. Instead, the existing arguments represent the philosophical positions of scientists without objective evidence.

Own a realistic sex doll torso

The sale of realistic human imitations in the form of sex doll torsos for sexual play is supported by a multi-million dollar global industry. Some models have artificial intelligence and the ability to miscommunicate with their owners, known as sex robots.

This has led to increased academic, social and legal attention. The law also applies to dangerous sex doll torsos for children. A 2020 study (Craig A. Harpercor and Rebecca Lievesley) examined the motivations for owning sex doll torsos. The author raises interesting questions.

Who is the (potential) owner of the sex doll torso?

Currently, these man-made objects appear to be primarily sexual, which may limit our understanding of the motivations for wanting to have them. About 70 percent of sex doll torso owners said that sexual gratification was the primary function of their real doll torso, others said their real doll torso was a form of companionship and a substitute for companionship.

Even among those who said that the primary purpose of their real doll torso was sex, owning an FJ doll was accompanied by other functions in more than 80 percent of cases. The illusion of intimacy underlies their strong attachment to the robot.

The Alleged Consequences and Effects of Owning a TPR sex doll torso

Researchers in bioethics, sociology, robotics, and law have raised concerns that lifelike sex doll torsos and robots promote the sexual objectification of women and reinforce traditional beauty standards and perceptions of attractiveness.

The result is a loss of human intimacy and connection in sexual interactions. In extreme cases, sex doll torso ownership can lead to the promotion of sexual violence against women, child sexual abuse, and pedophilia.

The programmability of sex robots allows their owners to essentially practice rape. However, sex doll torso ownership has not been proven to lead to sexual assault. It also raises questions about whether raping a robot is a crime.

It is believed that interacting with child sex doll torsos may increase the likelihood of child sexual abuse by desensitizing real doll torso users to the physical, emotional, and psychological harms of child sexual abuse and normalizing the behavior of the perpetrator.

At the same time, however, there is no evidence of therapeutic benefits from the use of child sex doll torsos. This also applies to relationships with women. Therefore, both the negative and positive effects of Cheap sex doll torso are unproven because they have not been studied.

In addition to the potential risks associated with owning sex doll torsos and robots, the study examines positive effects. The controlled use of real doll torsos in sexual and relationship counseling will make it possible to study the effectiveness of real doll torsos in alleviating sexual dysfunctions.

The use of child sex doll torsos in settings designed to prevent sexual abuse of persons sexually attractive to children is controversial.

Case studies of this practice should be evaluated to clarify controversies and open questions. sex doll torsos and robots can play a potential role in alleviating social and emotional isolation and treating sexual dysfunctions in medical and mental health settings.

Conclusion of the analysis

The aim of this study is to present the development of arguments in the existing literature on the motivations and effects of owning real doll torsos and sex robots. As a result, findings from social, cognitive and evolutionary psychology as well as current theories on the etiology of sexual crime revealed a lack of empirical research on the topic.

The current conclusions are based on ideological starting points that are incompatible with the often-cited risks. Social and legal experts should conduct more empirical research on this increasingly controversial social issue.